Category: Free Resources

“What Lies Beneath” – Inside Leadership Transition in a Charter School

By Susan M. Poglinco and Priscilla Rosenwald.

The authors collaborated on this article as a result of a partnership forged between a charter school Board Chair (Poglinco) and a retained Executive Search Leader (Rosenwald) of Leadership Recruiters with experience leading searches for organizations at critical crossroads. The two worked together for more than a year to launch an internal search committee, select a new leader and CEO, and get through the onboarding process in this 600 student charter school located in a large city in the northeast. This article chronicles some of the expected and unanticipated challenges they encountered.

Introduction 

Leadership transitions and organizational change can be difficult under the best of circumstances. Striking a balance between maintaining areas of success and achievement with the promise of a new direction for a school can be delicate. Change in leadership is, indeed, a painful thought. But avoiding or postponing leadership change could put the school in long-term jeopardy. What is most important is that the facts are faced and parameters put in place to ensure the school will continue to thrive and stand on its own without the current leadership; the school’s vitality and sustainability are the key factors to be considered.

When a long-term leader has been in their role for a decade or more, the board often defers to them for all organizational information, decisions and direction. Frequently, long-term leaders who have not had authentic performance conversations with the board leadership believe that the organization is theirs to oversee – until they get tired of showing up. The organization is often held hostage to the retirement considerations of the chief executive, who may no longer be leading the school into the future.  Boards are frequently remiss in not having regular performance expectations and comprehensive performance reviews with long-term school leaders. The performance review would focus on the health and sustainability of the school, and have input from the major stakeholders, including the senior leadership team.

Leadership

The charter school board understood the need for professional guidance and engaged an executive search firm. Without any prior leadership continuity planning, the leadership transition at the charter school required collaboration with the board leadership and the organization’s senior leadership in a transparent and inclusive way. Effective planning and processes had to be put in place to redirect and ensure an effective transition to new leadership.

In conjunction with Leadership Recruiters, we anticipated that change management might be an initial challenge as began an organizational assessment. We rolled out a leadership inventory questionnaire/planning tool and met with staff at the school to create a position description reflective of the demanding CEO role. One thing was immediately clear – many staff expressed a readiness for a change of leadership and welcomed the change. First Tip Off – The prospect of change was uniformly welcomed among teachers and other school staff.        

Outgoing CEO’s Backstory

At the time of the search, the CEO of the school had been in the role for close to a decade. He was committing to a new professional chapter in his life, and had been working toward that chapter for a number of years while in the CEO role at the school. The last two years at the school had been increasingly difficult, and the CEO was admittedly tired.

The Board

The CEO enjoyed a collegial relationship with the immediate past Board Chair. While a few tricky issues came up during her two-year term, she united the nine-person board and fostered a productive working relationship with both board members and the CEO – the status quo was maintained and the school was getting by on the surface. The board was comprised of committed members with good intentions, but board members were in need of strategic direction/capacity building to prepare them for the search and the imminent organizational transition.

The CEO publicly announced he was departing soon after the new Board Chair started her term. The new Board Chair was action-focused and charged with leading the search and the board through a complicated year. She started asking the kinds of questions that no one had ever asked of past board leadership or the CEO. A methodical audit of all aspects of the school revealed that there were inconsistent policies and procedures and less documentation than expected across critical aspects of the school. Second Tip Off – At the board level, while hunches existed that internal systems were not fully realized, the new Board Chair quickly confirmed that the state of affairs was worse than expected. (*Tide started to turn here)  

Leadership Team

The CEO presided over an 8-person Leadership Team in what might be called a “servant leader” model – defining his devotion to the school as “a calling.” Cloaked in humanity and service, the CEO inarguably had good intentions. Yet, the strategic and operational execution of a coherent and consistent academic agenda was often clouded by two persistent and inescapable realities within the school – school climate/student discipline and a challenging financial outlook for the school. At the helm of the Leadership Team, the CEO was overwhelmed. He neither promoted excellence nor tolerated dissent among Leadership Team members. Third Tip Off – Leadership Team members had the latitude to make decisions not because they earned it or had proven they could handle it, but out of benign neglect from a CEO who was consumed with the school’s financial challenges above all else.

 Communications

Most school staff characterized communications from the administration as inconsistent or non-existent. Fourth Tip Off – The CEO and Leadership Team were cloistered from the rest of the school staff. Leadership team decisions were communicated poorly with little rationale or transparency, or sometimes not at all.  All the staff lamented the lack of transparency.

Accountability

Across the school, there were few accountability systems – for teachers, Leadership Team members, students, or the CEO. Fifth Tip Off – While teacher observations were performed by the Principal, academic performance, especially among a core of failing students improved little. As far as instructional quality, it was variable teacher to teacher and there were no systems in place to rectify that variation. Chief among staff complaints was the lack of enforcement of a code of conduct and students not being held accountable for bad behavior. This was viewed as the province of the Dean of Students and the Principal, and not a shared responsibility across Leadership Team members and all school staff. It was then revealed than in a decade of service, the CEO had no record of written performance reviews by the board. The executive committee reported to review the CEO annually, but there was no paper trail, or stated performance objectives.

School Climate/Discipline

Disciplinary issues continued to rise among students in both numbers and severity, escalating into a series of events that was emblematic of all of the previously mapped out tip offs colliding. These events (which included a key leadership team member taking an abrupt leave of absence) were not communicated to the board until after the fact. Sixth Tip Off – (CEO lost good will of most board members after this.)

Human Resource Issues

In preparing to mount a national search for a new CEO, the executive search leader instructed the Board Chair that she needed an organizational chart that reflected the Leadership Team structure, because potential candidates would ask for that as they progressed through the candidacy pipeline. In addition, the Board Chair needed to track down job descriptions for all 8 Leadership Team members. She soon discovered that there was no organizational chart, no job descriptions for Leadership Team Members, and no documented formal review processes – no performance evaluation system. Seventh Tip Off – The Board Chair had to act quickly and outsource a short turnaround project with an HR consultant to get the necessary documents so the search could proceed and provide accurate organizational information about the school. (Board Chair intervened in basic operations of school out of necessity, not choice, because of impact on search.)

School Finances

The set up at the school had the CEO working with a charter school subcontractor who acted as Business and Finance Manager, resulting in an over-emphasis on dire financials at the risk of all other aspects of school performance or approaches to revenue enhancement. Eighth Tip Off – The internal COO had no responsibility for the financial systems, and revenue generation was the responsibility of a contracted fundraising professional. The alliance formed between the CEO and the Business Manager mutually reinforced the intractable nature of the financial challenges the school faced, and took the emphasis away from the academic and instructional aspects of the school, where the school was under-performing. Everyone was complicit in this, and entreaties to move beyond this discussion by the Board Chair were met with hostility from both the CEO and the Business Manager. The outgoing CEO was more aligned with a subcontractor than the Board Chair or the board, and as a result, all other aspects of the school suffered.

The Search Process

The search consultant and Board Chair led an engaged search committee, with representation from the faculty. Information gathered from the organizational assessment, and additional HR and financial due diligence, guided the leadership profile for the next CEO, as well as concurrent planning for system changes at the school, led by the Board Chair. During the transition, the outgoing CEO was encouraged to prepare for the knowledge transfer to his successor, and was subsequently honored at public events celebrating his tenure once the new hire was announced. The new CEO and Board Chair have engaged during the on-boarding process to prepare the school for change – leading to viability and sustainability.

Essential Takeaways

No amount of planning can prepare the Search Chair for “What Lies Beneath” over the course of the search process

Unforeseen challenges emerge during a search that will require decisive action and an independent thinker able to see beyond competing agendas. That is why it is critical to hire an experienced executive search professional and listen to them. This partnership cannot be understated. A capable executive search professional will act as a compass and ally, and coming from the outside – they will see dynamics that may escape you.

Strong leadership is best shared across all board members during a critical transition

The Search Chair can lead the process, but should be backed up by search committee members and board members in addressing the unforeseen challenges that may come up during the search process. A Search Chair aims to run a successful search. If pre-existing organizational circumstances put that at risk, it should be all hands on deck among board members.

Money is always an issue, it is never the ONLY issue

Demystify school finances – strike a balance between engagement and overemphasis. Board composition should deliberately include at least one or two board members with a background in school finance or accounting. The CEO should be engaged in the finances of the school, but not to the detriment of all the other pieces of the puzzle. The academic mission of the school and the instructional program are key to attracting additional funder/donor dollars and corporate support.

Incoming leaders will inherit “legacy challenges” with both school staff and the board

“Legacy challenges” like persistent academic failure among students and lower student enrollment numbers are two interconnected areas the new CEO has had to contend with immediately. Board composition analysis identified a need for two or three new board members with legal, HR or financial expertise.

Final Reflections

If you liken a charter school to the puzzle Jenga ™ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenga) – once you pull one piece out of the tower, the integrity of the entire structure is affected and weakened. In the different headings in this article from presenting the leadership transition to staff, the Board, the Leadership Team, Communications, Accountability, School Climate/Discipline, HR Issues, Finances – each section is a piece of the puzzle and constructs part of the tower. Yet within each building block there was a “Tip Off” that hinted at “what lies beneath” in the transition process. It is that which lurks underneath and reveals itself gradually that bedevils even the most efficient and effective transition processes.

 

Every “Tip Off” in the sequence threaded throughout this article was problematic on its own, but the interconnectedness of these puzzle pieces is what made the transition process at this charter school more complicated than anyone could have predicted from the onset. It’s fair to say that charter schools are not perfect places, they are not run by infallible human beings, or governed by stellar boards. It is our hope that in the depiction of the perfect storm – demonstrated by this school’s organizational transition, that one comes away with a strong sense of the realities required to prepare for leadership change.

Articles / White Papers

“What Lies Beneath” – Inside Leadership Transition in a Charter School

By Susan M. Poglinco and Priscilla Rosenwald. The authors collaborated on this article as a result of a partnership forged between a charter school Board Chair (Poglinco) and a retained Executive Search Leader (Rosenwald) of Leadership Recruiters with experience leading searches for organizations at critical crossroads. The two worked together for more than a year to launch an internal search committee, select a new leader and CEO, and get through the onboarding process in this 600 student charter school located in a large city in the northeast. This article chronicles some of the expected and unanticipated challenges they encountered. Introduction  Leadership transitions and organizational change can be difficult under the best of circumstances. Striking a balance between maintaining areas of success and achievement with the promise of a new direction for a school can be delicate. Change in leadership is, indeed, a painful thought. But avoiding or postponing leadership change could pu …


Nonprofit Leadership Transition: Sustaining Organizational Success When a Founder or Long-Term Leader Departs

Nonprofit organizations are predicted to transition their chief executive at a staggering rate for the foreseeable future. Many of these organizations are led by founders, or long-time leaders who have functioned as founders. Download White Paper. This document is featured on the Pennsylvania Nonprofit Report website.


Evaluating the Chief Executive

Many of the nonprofit chief executives we meet lament that they do not get ongoing feedback from their boards, or receive regular annual performance reviews. It’s hard for leaders to achieve their personal best when they lack feedback on which to base their development. This is particularly true for chief executives, who can be more isolated than other nonprofit executives. All too often, board leadership fails to regularly evaluate the chief executive. Over the years, board chairs have shared a variety of reasons for this over the years: “We know she is doing a good job, so we just tell her informally and give her a salary increase.” “It takes too much time, and it’s too difficult because we are not there to observe him day to day.” “We don’t hear any complaints from staff or funders, and the organization runs in the black, so why do we need to engage in a time consuming formal process?” Boards may think they know how the chief executive is really doing, but they frequently lack compr …


How Does a Leadership Transition Differ From an Executive Search?

A leadership transition is the management of the entire anticipation-departure-recruitment-integration process in a holistic fashion … It focuses on minimizing the risk and capturing all of the opportunities that a change in long-term and founding leaders offers. Leadership transitions begin with the chief executive’s decision to depart — or the Board’s commencement of transition planning — and extends through the hiring and successful on-boarding of the new executive. The transition management process includes: Helping the organization better understand its history, present situation, and future prospects as it relates to the selection of a new leader; Identifying and addressing any organizational challenges or legacy issues that might hinder the success of the incoming leader; Considering the need for an interim executive to shore up systems in preparation for new leadership; Ensuring that the governance team (the board and executive team) has a clear and effective social contract th …


Asleep at the Helm

In A Perfect Storm, we talked about the leadership crisis that ensues when boards avoid discussion of succession planning for fear of rocking the boat. More recently we’ve observed a new crisis — board leadership in high profile organizations with long-term chief executives who have neglected to provide serious oversight and due diligence. Often, the long-term or founding chief executive has been unreceptive to board oversight, while steering the ship without involving their board in critical strategic, financial, or capacity decisions. Imagine the board’s surprise when the organization hits stormy weather or the leader exits dramatically. It is no surprise that these boards subsequently discover financial mismanagement and the ravages of autocratic leadership that has resulted in poor morale and ailing programs/services. The board then navigates with all hands on deck and frantically seeks a turn-around skipper. If only wishful thinking were replaced by strategic governance… How abo …


Letter to the Editor: Stanford Social Innovation Review

Thank you for publishing “Mission-Driven Governance.” After working with dozens of nonprofits, I have found that board members do not fully appreciate… Download Letter >


Creating a Leadership Legacy … Managing Successful Executive Transitions

Leadership transitions are under-realized opportunities to strengthen organizations. If founders and visionary leaders approach the transition process as an opportunity to add capacity and strength, they are able to anticipate the strategic challenges that impact the staff, board, and community stakeholders during the change in leadership. Prior to recruiting a successor, organizations can address the important presenting issues, work through the change process, and implement new strategies and new directions. In our work with seasoned nonprofit leaders, we know that for many individuals, thinking about moving on while leaving a legacy can be a source of anxiety. It is difficult to talk publicly about succession because it seems to make your board, your staff and key funders apprehensive. Our approach to succession planning is to create a long-term process for assessing, managing and developing talent across the organization. The goal is not to name specific successors, but to identify …


Best Practices for Effective Board Leadership

Every nonprofit organization (as well as public agency) is looking for the perfect board chairperson who can excel at every aspect of leading the organization to the next level. It’s true that the board chair is a critical element to a successful organization. Selecting a board chair must be a careful and strategically well-planned process. You don’t select a board chair based on who raises their hand first and cries “pick me.” Serving as the chair of a board is not a role for the undecided or inexperienced. To do the job right demands at times exceptional and supernatural qualities, endless energy, and undivided attention and commitment. Accepting the responsibility of leading a nonprofit board, not just serving as a figurehead, assumes that the chair possesses the leadership competencies through demonstrated (professional or volunteer) experience to do an effective job and produce results, namely leading a team, running a business, or handling the allocation of resources. From our ex …


Ensuring Mission-Driven Board Leadership

After working with dozens of nonprofit organizations — both on the inside and the outside — I have found that, regardless of the size or scope of the organization, board members do not fully appreciate the strategic importance of their governance role. It’s not an easy topic to talk about. After all, many nonprofit board members are well-established leaders in their communities, and they are confident that they understand their role on the board and fulfill it dutifully. Ultimately it comes down to a simple question: “Is the board acting in the best interest of the organization’s mission or simply administrating its activities?” If the answer is the latter, it’s time to re-educate the board. This is most evident in times of leadership change. A proactive, mission-focused board will build succession planning into their strategic process. Not surprisingly, many organizations have not focused on succession planning or talent management, so the departure of the chief executive leaves the b …


How to Weather the Loss of a Leader and Keep Up the Mission

Recovering after an unexpected departure – or in this unfortunate case, an untimely passing – can be a major challenge for nonprofits and corporations alike and it can happen to any group, at any time, regardless of its size.  — Download Article >


The Perfect Storm: or How to Plan a Leadership Crisis

In Sebastian Junger’s award winning novel, “The Perfect Storm”, a confluence of conditions combined to form a killer storm in the North Atlantic. The strong-willed and stubborn captain ignored the warnings and forged ahead, mortally endangering his crew and his ship. A leadership transition can unleash the perfect storm organizationally in much the same way. Often we find many boards even seek the thrills that may come with a leadership crisis. Denial is a great avoidance mechanism. For most organizations, it is just too painful to think that your beloved executive could be lured away by another organization. The board knows they have a star — why worry? It never occurs to you that others may recognize that star power and actively recruit it. Your ED’s health or family crisis would never be serious enough for it to take precedence over the organization; that happens to other folks. And of course, your executive director is so committed to your agency and its mission that he or she woul …


The Interim Interlude in a Transition

One of the most overlooked opportunities in executive transitions is how to make the most of the interim period, which is the time between the departure of the incumbent and when the new executive starts. Some boards panic during this time and rush to find someone to “bridge the gap.” One of the most overlooked opportunities in executive transitions is how to make the most of the interim period, which is the time between the departure of the incumbent and when the new executive starts. Some boards panic during this time and rush to find someone to “bridge the gap.” Providing stable management for an organization when it is without a permanent executive is important, but so much more is possible. A competent intentional interimcan help institute changes that can turn around an organization in crisis. In stable organizations, an interim can provide an important respite between a founder, or other “big shoes” leader, and his/her successor. This interim time can be essential for the organi …


Nonprofit Leadership Transition: Sustaining Organizational Success When a Founder or Long-Term Leader Departs

Nonprofit organizations are predicted to transition their chief executive at a staggering rate for the foreseeable future. Many of these organizations are led by founders, or long-time leaders who have functioned as founders.
Download White Paper.

This document is featured on the Pennsylvania Nonprofit Report website.

Evaluating the Chief Executive

Many of the nonprofit chief executives we meet lament that they do not get ongoing feedback from their boards, or receive regular annual performance reviews. It’s hard for leaders to achieve their personal best when they lack feedback on which to base their development. This is particularly true for chief executives, who can be more isolated than other nonprofit executives.

Read more »

Creating a Leadership Legacy … Managing Successful Executive Transitions

Leadership transitions are under-realized opportunities to strengthen organizations. If founders and visionary leaders approach the transition process as an opportunity to add capacity and strength, they are able to anticipate the strategic challenges that impact the staff, board, and community stakeholders during the change in leadership.
Read more »